A missing or unidentified mugshot : prisoner Alfred HARRINGTON

MISSING MUGSHOTS and MISSING FRIENDS
The CASE of Alfred HARRINGTON
CHRIS LONG reprints 1985

The research we have provided on these weblogs since 2003 about the police work of professional photographer Thomas J. Nevin in Tasmania during the 1870s and the mugshots he produced has stimulated and inspired a global reading public. If you are curious enough to pursue your own detective work regarding the prisoner’s identity in this handful of the few remaining mugshots yet to be documented (see below), take advice from researcher Peter Doyle. In his latest publication of mugshots from the NSW Justice and Police Museum , Crooks Like Us (2009), Doyle states that the police gazettes were the first he consulted and the most reliable source of information (p.312). The equivalent Tasmanian police gazettes are available as searchable CDs (from Gould’s) and are also online at the Archives Office of Tasmania (although not as easily searchable). These police records are by far the most reliable source of information about the 300 extant mugshots which are estrays of more than 2000 originals and duplicates taken by Thomas J. Nevin and his brother Constable John Nevin between 1871 and 1886.





Peter Doyle, Crooks Like Us (2009)
Photos copyright KLW NFC 2010 ARR.

Read more pages in this slideshow: CROOKS LIKE US – click here

Alfred Harrington
Was Alfred Harrington, convicted of manslaughter in 1870, ever photographed for police records, and if not, why not?



Alfred Harrington, absconded and arrested 13 March 1874
Source: Tasmania Reports of Crime for Police, 1874 (weekly police gazette)

TRANSCRIPT
Alfred Harrington, F.C. per Fortitude, 30 years of age, 5 feet 7 inches high, fresh complexion, light brown hair, grey eyes, short nose, small mouth, round chin, stout build, an Englishman, a quarryman. Has relatives at Kangaroo Point and Hobart Town.
Alfred Harrington aged 30 yrs, was reported as absconding from Port Arthur and reported as arrested within the week by the Port Arthur police: both reports were published in the same issue of the police gazette Tasmania Reports of Crime on 13th March 1874. He must have received an additional charge for absconding which placed him under a further sentence extending into 1875, despite the remission of his eight (8) year sentence to four (4) years in October 1874 for his murder of David Johnston (or Johnson) at the Mangana mine site (north east Tasmania) in 1870.

The detailed description of Alfred Harrington's appearance in 1874 would assist descendants in identifying him among the handful of prisoners whose mugshots are currently un-named at the Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery, Launceston  (see below for the black & white copies made at the QVMAG in 1985 from Thomas Nevin's sepia originals taken for police in the 1870s).



Alfred Harrington discharged 21 October 1874
Source: Tasmania Reports of Crime for Police, 1874 (weekly police gazette)

Alfred Harrington was discharged on 21st October 1874, residue of sentence remitted. He was F.C. - i.e. Free to the Colony, arriving as an eleven year (11) old bounty immigrant with his family on the Fortitude from London in 1855. The family group included his parents Robert and Mary Ann, both 43 yrs old; daughters Mary Ann, 20 yrs old and Emma, 5 yrs old; and sons Robert (13  yrs old), Alfred (11 yrs old), John (8 yrs old) and James (2 yrs old).



Top left: Harrington family arrival on the Fortitude, Hobart
Harrington, Alfred
Record Type:Arrivals
Arrival date:15 Feb 1855
Departure port:Plymouth
Ship:Fortitude
Remarks:Age 11
Record ID:NAME_INDEXES:434530
Resource:CB7/12/1/3 BK5
Archives Office of Tasmania

Alfred Harrington, 22 yrs old,  married Jessie Price, 19 yrs old, on 25th January 1865 at St, Mark's Church Bellerive, Hobart (Archives Office of Tasmania Resource: RGD37/1/24 no 34). Between  1865 and 1870, Jessie Harrington nee Price gave birth to Joseph (1865), Robert (1867), Alfred (1869) and Frederick (1870). Another son called William was born ca. 1877. A daughter called Dora died on 14th March 1877, six months old, of diarrhea.

The crime committed by Alfred Harrington at Mangana in July 1870 was deeply shocking to those who knew him, to the doctor who attended the victim, to the police when Alfred voluntarily gave himself up, and to the public at large when details of the manslaughter were published. This report, for example, was published in the Mercury on Friday, 15 July 1870, p.2:
MURDER AT FINGAL. -
A correspondent writing from Fingal supplies us with the following particulars. He says :" I hasten to acquaint you with the particulars of a melancholy and murderous assault committed by a native of Hobart Town, named Alfred Harrington. From what I have been able to learn it appears that Harrington was working in a shaft that is now being sunk on the Liverpool Company's Claim, at Mangana, along with Mr. David Johnston, formerly a cooper of Hobart Town, but who had lately returned to Tasmania from the Coromandel Gold-fields, in New Zealand, and who was employed by the company, on account of his practical experience as a miner, to superintend tho sinking of the shaft. Both men it appears were working together in the hole when, as it is conjectured, some dispute arose between them and Harrington, being of an excitable temperament, lost all self-control and struck Johnston several times on tho back of the head with his pick. He then left the hole and told several people that he had ' murdered his mate David Johnston, and left him in the hole,' and, no doubt, believing that his victim was dead he went immediately and gave himself up to the police charging himself with having caused Johnston's death. This sad event took place on Monday the 11th instant, and immediately after its becoming known a number of people hurried to the spot, and Johnston, who was quite insensible but not dead, was removed from the hole, and medical aid at once obtained. The doctor has just left him, and states that it is quite impossible that he can recover as his brains are protruding at intervals, and he is fast sinking. He has lost his eyesight, and his limbs are becoming cold. He has not a moment's consciousness since he was discovered, and consequently could not give any account of the sad affair. All Johnston's property has been removed to the Police Office. As the break does not leave till to-morrow morning I will keep my letter open to give you the latest particulars. It is now half-past seven o'clock on Wednesday morning, and Johnston is still lingering, but he cannot survive much longer, though it is possible he may survive till the evening." A telegram was received in town yesterday announcing Johnston's death.
Source: Mercury (Hobart, Tas. : 1860 - 1954), Friday 15 July 1870, page 2

The next day, July 16th, the Mercury published a letter signed "A. Tasmanian" informing the paper that Alfred Harrington was not a "native of Hobart Town" - the usual description of someone locally-born which distinguishes them from arriving as a convicted criminal - and that he had arrived on the Fortitude 16 years earlier.  The reporter at the  Launceston Examiner, writing from the Police Office on the same day (Saturday 16 July 1870, page 4), went into the grisly details of the attack by Alfred Harrington on David Johnston (or Johnson):
POLICE OFFICE, JULY 14. (Before Thomas Ransom, Esq., J.P.,Warden.) Alfred Harrington was charged that he did at Mangana, on 11th May, 1870, feloniously assault David Johnson, with intent to kill and murder him. The Superintendent of Police applied for a remand, which was granted for seven days. The prisoner was brought up on the above charge because his victim still lives, and although utterly unconscious, appears to breathe regularly and to be free from pain. I saw him to-day, and he has three terrible wounds on the back of his bead, through which I could see the pulsation of the brain. It is a miracle that he has lived so long. The pick with which the wounds were inflicted is covered with blood at the hammer and there are human hairs sticking to it. One of the blows cut through the hat of the injured man. It is a dreadful affair. The prisoner is a tall, good-looking man of about 35 years of age; fair, quiet, but determined looking, and of great strength. I believe he is tractable and easily managed in gaol, and at the above hearing made no remark, and appeared quite composed. He is by no means such a man in appearance as would be taken to be of a violent disposition, although I believe he has the character of being sullen. It is impossible to communicate with Johnson as he cannot speak, and has not spoken except saying no or yes once or twice. He also is a fine man, and well-known at Mangana. The place where the crime was committed is very lonely, and but for the prisoner giving himself up and saying what he had done, Jonston would have died where he lay. Of course, he was immediately removed to Mangana, but all hope of his recovery is at an end: I expect every moment to hear that he is dead.
Source: Launceston Examiner (Tas. : 1842 - 1899)  Sat 16 Jul 1870  Page 4  POLICE OFFICE, JULY 14.

Here again are details of Alfred Harrington's appearance which may assist in identifying him in any remaining extant mugshots of un-named prisoners - "tall, good-looking man ... fair, quiet, but determined looking, and of great strength...has the character of being sullen "etc.

Initially reported as a ten year sentence for wilful murder, Alfred Harrington was sentenced at the Supreme Court Launceston on 20th October 1870 to eight years for manslaughter. He was transferred to the Hobart Gaol  and discharged from Hobart on the 21st October 1874, having served exactly four years of a ten year sentence.  In the course of police routine, he would have been photographed by Thomas Nevin at the Hobart Gaol during incarceration, or at the Mayor's Court, Hobart Town Hall and Municipal Police Office on discharge. His name was not included in the list of prisoners sent to Port Arthur after 1870 and sent back again to the Hobart Gaol which was tabled in the Tasmanian parliament on 9th June 1873. His name was not among those whose earnings were documented at the Port Arthur from 1869-1876 (Conduct PA Registers Con 94-1-2 1873-76 etc) Those men were all photographed by Thomas Nevin  at the Hobart Gaol either BEFORE they were sent to Port Arthur (from 1872, after the transfer of prisons from Imperial to Colonial governance) or AFTER they returned to the city gaol in Campbell St. Hobart (from June 1873). And photographed again in most cases when they were discharged. Dozens of mugshots of men discharged in 1874 - as Alfred Harrington was on 21st October - survive in public collections, but Harrington's is either missing, never existed, or survives as one of the several unidentified prints or cdvs. He had no recorded alias in the police gazette notices, so the possibility of his mugshot existing but misnamed is unlikely.

Jessie Harrington nee Price



This notice which reported that - (a) Alfred Harrington was still under sentence at Port Arthur in 1875 and (b) that his wife was missing, supposed to living with a man at O'Brien's Bridge (Glenorchy) -  was published in the police gazette on November 5th, 1875, page 174. If Jessie Harrington nee Price was missing in 1875, by March 1877 she was found, up on a charge of deserting one of her children:
CHILD DESERTION. - A young woman named Jessie Harrington, was charged by Mr. Oatley, relieving officer of the Charitable Grants Department, with leaving her child without means of support. The defendant admitted the charge, and pleaded that she had been compelled to go into the country to obtain means of support from the child's father. She promised that in future she would take proper care of the child. On the recommendation of the magistrate, Mr. Oatley withdrew the charge.
Source: Mercury (Hobart, Tas. : 1860 - 1954), Saturday 3 March 1877, page 3

Jessie Harrington was born ca. 1846, married Alfred Harrington in 1865, and gave birth to his four  sons between 1865 and 1870. She had another a son called William ca. 1876 and a daughter Dora who died at 6 months in March 1877. William was the child she left with the Charitable Grants Dept. The warrant for her arrest was issued on 17th February, 1877. She was arrested on 2nd March 1877, per these notices in the police gazette:



TRANSCRIPT
WARRANTS ISSUED, AND NOW IN THIS OFFICE.
HOBART TOWN. - On the 12th instant, by John Perkins, Jun, Esquire, J. P., for the arrest of Jessie Harrington, charged with having left her child, William Harrington, without means of support.
Description
About 30 years of age, medium height, brown hair, hazel eyes, a house servant, native of Tasmania.
Warrant for Jessie Harrington's arrest, issued 12 February 1877, pub. 16th.
Source: Tasmania Reports of Crime for Police


TRANSCRIPT
Referring to Jessie Harrington, she is supposed to be living at or about Southport; every effort should be made to effect her arrest....
Jessie Harrington has been arrested by Sergeant John Wallace, of the Glenorchy Municipal Police.
Arrest of Jessie Harrington, 2nd March 1877.
Source: Tasmania Reports of Crime for Police

Jessie Harrington was resident in Melville Street Hobart when the death was registered. She died on 29th April, 1886 of phthisis (pulmonary tuberculosis) at Hobart. If she was compelled, as she told Mr Oatley, to seek support from her husband in the country, she was compelled by law. Alfred Harrington's death is not recorded before 1900, but his registration as informant of the death of his one year old nephew, also named Alfred Harrington, recorded him at Waratah, in western Tasmania, site of a large tin mine,  in March 1892 ((RGD35-1-61p198j2k), so he most likely returned to mining, although he appears not to have resumed his marriage with Jessie.

So, which of these men whose mugshots remain un-named in the Beattie Collection at the QVMAG, Launceston, most closely fits the descriptions provided by the police gazette and the Mercury journalist? "

Is this Alfred - 30 yrs old, tall, fair, good looking, small nose, mouth etc -?



Unidentified Tasmanian prisoner
Black & white copy made in 1985
Sepia original taken by gov't contractor Thomas J. Nevin 1870s
QVMAG Ref: 1985_P_0167

Or is this Alfred - "has the character of being sullen" ?



Unidentified Tasmanian prisoner
Black & white copy made in 1985
Sepia original taken by gov't contractor Thomas J. Nevin 1870s
QVMAG Ref: 1985_P_0162



Thomas Nevin's original sepia prints from glass for police rap sheets
Unidentified prisoners taken at Hobart 1870s
Pasted into one of three panels by John Watt for exhibitions of convictaria 1915
QVMAG Collection: Ref : 1983_p_0163-0176



One of three panels 1915 featuring  forty prints of 1870s Tasmania prisoners
Original prints of negatives by T. J. Nevin 1870s
Panels created by J. W. Beattie ca. 1915
QVMAG Collection: Ref : 1983_p_0163-0176

T. J. Nevin at Port Arthur 
The group of 109 prisoners who were sent to Port Arthur from 1871 and transferred back to the Hobart Gaol from June 1873 onwards were photographed at the HOBART GAOL by government contractor Thomas Nevin. They were  NOT photographed at Port Arthur by its Commandant the non-photographer A.H.Boyd, despite circumstantial speculation, wild inaccuracies and ignorance of forensic photography by Chris Long and Warwick Reeder.  The mugshots of most of those men tabled as prisoners returning to the Hobart Gaol in June 1873 have survived in public collections. Alfred Harrington's name is not among those on any list.

Thomas Nevin photographed very few prisoners while on site at the Port Arthur prison in May 1874 at the behest of its Commandant-Surgeon Dr Coverdale. Prisoner James Rogers was one of the few whose mugshot is extant (TMAG collection), discharged on 26th May, 1874. Four more prisoners who were received from Port Arthur at the Hobart Gaol and discharged within weeks during January,  February and April 1874 - George FisherThomas Francis, John Moran and Thomas Saunders - were all photographed by Nevin at the Hobart Gaol. The rest of those still imprisoned at Port Arthur after May 1874 were either paupers who were not photographed on their transfer to charitable institutions in Hobart, or they were recidivists with on-going sentences who transferred to the Hobart Gaol by the time of the closure of Port Arthur in 1877.

The majority of extant photographs of Tasmanian prisoners ("convicts" in tourist discourse) date from the commencement of Thomas Nevin's government contract in February 1872, with the introduction of pertinent legislation in NSW, Victoria and Tasmania, up to 1886 when he ceased professional photography. The inscription "Taken at Port Arthur 1874" which was written on the versos of 300 or so of Nevin's originals originated from convictarian John Watt Beattie's collection in the early 1900s when they were displayed at his "Port Arthur Museum" in Hobart, and exhibited at the Royal Hotel Sydney in 1916 in conjunction with the travelling convictaria exhibitions on board the fake convict hulk Success. Beattie's collection of Nevin's photographs of prisoners which he had salvaged from the Hobart Goal photographer's room and the Sheriff's Office in 1915, was deposited at the Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery in 1927 and later dispersed piecemeal to other public collections (National Library of Australia, the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery, the Archives Office of Tasmania and the Mitchell Library SLNSW). It is entirely possible that a prisoner identification photograph was taken of Alfred Harrington, and that it has been lost, damaged by flood, or deliberately removed from the archives by descendants.

Chris Long's long con
Amateur historian Chris Long spent a few weeks at the QVMAG in Launceston in 1985 re-photographing as black & white prints the 40 uncut cdvs of prisoners taken by Nevin in the 1870s  (those on the three panels, example above), fogging out cracks and scratches on the sepia originals in the process for reasons only known to himself, since they serve no purpose, unless he single-mindedly decided to muddy their provenance as Nevin's, and their primary function as police mugshots, in order to cover up his stupid error in proclaiming that Nevin didn't take the photos, contradicting historical evidence and the experts in the field, and that they were taken by the Commandant at Port Arthur, A. H. Boyd,  never before heard of as a "photographer" by anyone for the simple reason he wasn't one. No photograph of prisoners or of any other subject in any genre was ever attributed to the non-photographer A. H. Boyd prior to Chris Long's long game of gambling his reputation on this silly claim. Chris Long's impulse as usual was to satisfy his personal need to imprint his own fantasy on primary historical documents until the facts about them all but disappear under his gifted amateur touch (gifting  himself and grifting others in the process). The originals of the 40 uncut cdvs had been removed from the prisoners' Hobart Gaol rap sheets of the 1870s by John Watt Beattie and pasted in three panels for exhibition and sale in 1916.

A selection of the QVMAG collection of these mugshots was exhibited at the Art Gallery of NSW in 1976 and at the QVMAG in 1977 as the work of Thomas J. Nevin . All of the prisoners in the photographs mounted as cdvs had been named by that date - some incorrectly - by archivists either for the 1934 exhibition in memory of John Watt Beattie and his convictaria collection, or by the curatorial staff there in 1958, in 1977, in 1983-5, and 1991 - dates which appear either on the versos or in the accession sheets of public institutions which received Nevin's originals, Nevin's duplicates, or Beattie's copies. The Archives Office of Tasmania holds similar images, both originals and copies, and some are of unidentified prisoners, although the same man in the same print is identified in the QVMAG collection. All men pictured in the mugshots held at the National Library of Australia in Canberra - and many picture the same men as those listed in the QVMAG collection and in the National Library's collection - were identified on accession in 1962, 1982 and 1985, including the identity of the photographer T. J. Nevin, indicating clearly that the NLA received its collection from Tasmania.

The prints below are Chris Long's cleaned-up black & white reprints from Nevin's 1870s sepia prints which Beattie had pasted in three panels, and which Long reproduced in 1985 at the QVMAG, their purpose known only to Long himself. Most of these prisoners have been identified. With some patience, the prisoners in these reproductions at the QVMAG (1985) can be identified by collating the sepia uncut originals (1870s) with the original carte-de-visite prints inside oval buff mounts (1870s-1880s) held at the QVMAG,  TMAG, and NLA, leaving a bundle who remain unidentified.

















Chris Long's cleaned-up black & white reprints from Nevin's 1870s sepia prints,
Reproduced in 1985 at the QVMAG.
Photos by Thomas J. Nevin (1842-1923)
QVMAG Collection Launceston Tasmania

Although these four prisoners below are not identified at the QVMAG, their names appear on the same photograph, either unmounted or printed in an oval mount, held in other public collections; for example, there are more than fifty (50) held at the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery, and eighty-four (with duplicates, 87) held at the National Library.There is another group, named in the collection of thirteen prisoner mugshots by T. J. Nevin held in the Mitchell Collection, State Library of NSW,





Unidentified prisoners, Archives Office of Tasmania



Unidentified at AOT, identified as Thomas Jackson at QVMAG

RELATED POSTS main weblog
Updated January 2019

Habitual offender Edward WALLACE at the Hobart Gaol

Edward Wallace aka Timothy Donovan was a transported felon, arriving in Hobart from Dublin on board the Blenheim (2), on February 2nd, 1849. He became an habitual offender. His photograph is held at the Mitchell Library Sydney, SLNSW, in a box of nine cartes-de-visite of prisoners taken by Thomas J. Nevin at the Hobart Gaol. The collection was bequeathed by David Scott Mitchell to the State Library of NSW ca 1907 (PXB 274). The Mitchell Library has catalogued all these nine photographs with the date "1878"; however, two of the photographs were taken by Nevin in 1875 (those of Mullins and Smith), and this one, of Edward Wallace was more likely to have been taken by Nevin in 1872 or early 1873, when Wallace was re-arrested for absconding from the Hobart Gaol.

Prisoner Edward Wallace photo by T J Nevin SLNSW

Carte-de-visite of prisoner Edward Wallace
Taken by Thomas J. Nevin at the Hobart Gaol between 1873 and 1878
Held at the Mitchell Library, SLNSW (PXB 274)
All photos © KLW NFC 2009


1849: Convict transportation records at the Archives Office of Tasmania and police records show that Edward Wallace was transported with the alias Timothy Donovan, leaving Dublin on 1st November, 1848, arriving Hobart on 2nd February 1849:

Database Number: 72954
Family Name: Wallace
Given Names: Edward
Date of Arrival: 02 Feb 1849
Ship Name: Blenheim (2)
Date of Departure: 01 Nov 1848
Port of Departure: Dublin
Remarks:Transported as Timothy Donovan



On his discharge, Edward Wallace's distinguishing marks and features were noted in the police gazette:
Age: 50
Height: 5 feet 3half inches
Hair: Black
Conditions: Free in Servitude
Scar: centre upper lip, wart on forehead above right eye, scar left cheek under ear

THE VERSO



The verso of the photograph of Edward Wallace (on left) is transcribed with these details:
"Edward Wallace
F. S. [free in servitude]
P.O. Lnston [Police Office Launceston]
17.12.78
9 Months
Larceny"
Although this transcription on verso might suggest that this photograph of Wallace was taken on that date, 17 December 1878 and at that place, the Police Office Launceston, this was not the case. His sentence on that date was 9 months. Sentences of three months and longer warranted the transfer of the prisoner from regional and rural lockups including the Launceston Police Office to the main prison, the Hobart Gaol in Campbell Street where he was bathed, shaved and issued with a prison uniform before being photographed. Below this photograph on the front of the carte-de-visite is the handwritten transcription - "Gaol -Hobart" - which indicates that this identification mugshot (and its duplicates) was used for official Hobart gaol documents and the Police Office Register Book as well as being pasted to the prisoner's criminal record sheet and to any warrants issued subsequently for arrest.

Take note: the verso DOES NOT STATE WHEN the photograph was taken: the details pertain only to the subject of the photograph, the prisoner, NOT to the photograph itself as an artefact.

POLICE RECORDS
Source: Tasmania Reports of Crime Information for Police Government Printer

police records Tasmania 1870s

1868: Edward Wallace alias Timothy Donovan was convicted and sentenced to three years for housebreaking and robbery in the Recorder's Court Launceston on the 6th February 1868, and transferred by Page's coach to the Hobart Gaol. He was not long at the Hobart Gaol when he absconded, and was sentenced to a further 18 months on 26th September 1868. By early 1871 he had been transferred to the prison at Port Arthur, 60kms south of Hobart to serve the remainder of his sentence.


1871-1872: Edward Wallace was discharged from Port Arthur between the 14-18 September 1872, having served his sentence of three years delivered in February 1868 plus another 18 months for absconding from Hobart on 26 September 1868. While at Port Arthur he was additionally sentenced as follows:Idleness at Port Arthur 25 January 1871, 7 days
Fighting at Port Arthur, 17 October 1871, 1 month



1873: Less than six months after his discharge, Edward Wallace was listed again as convicted on 29th March 1873 for larceny with another 3 months' sentence, this time at Westbury. He would have served this sentence too at the Hobart Gaol.



There is little doubt that police and prison officials would have wanted to enforce the new regulations requiring photographs of second offenders when Wallace was discharged in September 1872. That this photograph of prisoner Edward Wallace in prison issue clothing exhibits the same emblematic features of Nevin's early 1870s' commercial studio portraiture technique - especially the relaxed pose and ghosting of the backdrop sheet - would indicate that it was taken between 1872 and 1873, rather than the later date of 1878. These same poses and backgrounding techniques are evident in Nevin's extant portraits of his solicitor since 1868, Attorney-General Giblin (AOT), and his newly wedded wife Elizabeth Rachel Day (Nevin Family Collection, 1871). Several duplicates would have existed, and Nevin's original glass negative would have been used to reprint the photograph of Wallace we now have, placed on this carte inside a blue crossed frame. It may have been reprinted several times up to 1878 at the Hobart Gaol by Thomas Nevin's brother, Constable John (W.J. or Jack) Nevin, on Wallace's last recorded conviction in December 1878 and eventual discharge in September 1879. But as both of these later dates pertain to Launceston, and the photograph itself carries the wording "Goal -Hobart", the photograph as a glass negative must have already existed by March 1873.

1877: Edward Wallace was convicted and sentenced to 6 months for larceny on 10th March 1877, this time at Deloraine.



Edward Wallace was arrested on 2nd March 1877 (per notice below) and convicted on 10th March 1877.



1878: One year later, Edward Wallace was arrested and convicted again of larceny, this time at Launceston, on 21st December 1878. This is the offence which was transcribed on the verso of the extant photograph now held at the Mitchell Library Sydney. The handwriting appears archaic, but it may not have been transcribed on that date. It may be the work of the collector David Scott Mitchell or even later archivists rather than the handwriting of the police when the photograph was in official circulation.



The sentence of another 9 months when Edward Wallace convicted again for larceny, notice published on 21st December 1878.

1879: Edward Wallace was discharged from the Launceston Police Office on 17 September 1879. The details on the verso of his carte-de-visite were written concerning this conviction date, completed in September 1879, and were taken from this record of discharge. Only his last sentence of 9 months is recorded for his conviction on 17 December 1878 . The original photograph, however, was taken at the Hobart Gaol, as the transcription below the image indicates. Wallace was photographed there, and may have been photographed by Nevin as early as 1872 or 1873, given the commercial qualities of the photographic execution.



On his discharge, Edward Wallace's distinguishing marks and features were noted in the police gazette:
Age: 50
Height: 5 feet 3half inches
Hair: Black
Conditions: Free in Servitude
Scar: centre upper lip, wart on forehead above right eye, scar left cheek under ear



Carte-de-visite photographs of prisoners Edward Wallace (left) and Hugh Cowan (right)
Taken by Thomas J. Nevin at the Hobart Gaol between 1873 and 1878
Held at the Mitchell Library, SLNSW (PXB 274)
All photos © KLW NFC 2009




The verso of the photographs of Edward Wallace and Hugh Cowan
All photos © KLW NFC 2009

Thomas FRANCIS was photographed by T.J. NEVIN on 6th Feb 1874

Thomas Francis was discharged from Port Arthur, per the first notice (below) in the police gazette dated 31st January - 4th February, 1874. Note that no physical details of the prisoner had been recorded by the police in Hobart up to that date, 4th February 1874, because he had not re-offended and not yet photographed on discharge per regulations. A second notice appeared in the police gazette one week later, dated 6th February 1874, which included his age - 62 yrs, height - 5'5" - color of hair - "brown" and distinguishing marks, viz. bullet mark on left leg, bayonet mark on thumb, scar on chin. These details were written and recorded when Thomas J. Nevin photographed the prisoner Thomas Francis on that date - 6th February 1874 - at the Office of Inspector of Police, Hobart Town Hall.



NLA CATALOGUE NOTES (incorrect information)
nla.pic-vn4269870 PIC P1029/14 LOC Album 935 Thomas Francis, Ly. [i.e. Lady] Franklin 4, taken at Port Arthur, 1874 [picture] 1874. 1 photograph on carte-de-visite mount : albumen ; 9.4 x 5.6 cm. on mount 10.5 x 6.3 cm. Part of Convict portraits, Port Arthur, 1874 [picture]

Hundreds of these 1870s mugshots of Tasmanian prisoners were transcribed and displayed in museum exhibitions in Tasmania between 1915 and 1934 with the generic date "1874" and place "Port Arthur" regardless of each prisoner's individual criminal history, some of whom had never been incarcerated there. The National Library of Australia catalogue note records only what was written on the verso of this and dozens of other photographs in their collection of the so-called "Convicts, Port Arthur 1874" when they were acquired by donation in Canberra in 1964 (Dan Sprod papers NLA MS 2320 1.5.64 Missionary history) and in 1985 (per interview with John McPhee, NPG, 1984). Most of these photographs are duplicates made by T. J. Nevin from his negative of a single sitting with the prisoner, taken for use by police.

Thomas FRANCIS was photographed by T.J. Nevin, the only photographer and the only commercial photographer contracted to the Municipal Police Office and Attorney-General's Office in the early 1870s to provide the police with prisoner identification mugshots. The photograph was taken at the MPO, Hobart Town Hall, between the 2nd and 6th February 1874, and not at the Port Arthur prison. This prisoner was one of three men photographed on that date: John MORAN and Thomas SAUNDERS were also discharged and photographed in Hobart by T.J. Nevin between 4th-6th February 1874. The carte-de-visite of Moran is held at the National Library of Australia, and a print from Nevin's original negative of Moran is held at the Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery. The cdv of Saunders is also held at the QVMAG:



[Above and below]:
John Moran, photographed on discharge by T.J. Nevin at the MPO Hobart Town Hall on 6th February 1874. The print from Nevin's glass negative of John Moran is held at the QVMAG; the cdv in an oval mount is held at the NLA.





[Above]: Thomas Saunders, photographed on discharge at the MPO Hobart Town Hall by T.J. Nevin on 6th February, 1874. This cdv is held at the QVMAG and numbered recto "133" in the late 20th century when the QVMAG copied hundreds from their collection for dispersal to the Archives Office and Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery in Hobart .

POLICE RECORDS



[Above]: the first police gazette notice for Thomas Francis (and John Moran), received from Port Arthur and discharged between 31st January and 4th February. No physical details were recorded for either prisoner.


Source: Tasmania Reports of Crime Information for Police, Gov't printer.

[Above]: the second police gazette notice of Thomas Francis (including John Moran and Thomas Saunders), discharged from the Office of Inspector of Police, Hobart Town, dated 6th February 1874. Full physical details were transcribed and gazetted only after Thomas Francis (and John Moran)  reported for discharge, and received an FS on discharge - Free in Servitude - in Francis' case, and a TL - ticket of leave - in the case of Moran and Saunders. All three men - Thomas Francis, John Moran and Thomas Saunders - were  photographed by Thomas J. Nevin at the Office of Inspector of Police, which was located in the Hobart Town Hall no later than the 6th February and no earlier than the 31st January - 4th February 1874, in Hobart, and not at Port Arthur.

DO NOT BELIEVE WHAT YOU READ or HEAR from Edwin Barnard
Edwin Barnard claims to be the author of a recent publication sponsored by the National Library of Australia titled Exiled: The Port Arthur Convict Photographs (Edwin Barnard, NLA 2010).



This extract about the photograph of Thomas FRANCIS appears on page 83 of Exiled: The Port Arthur Convict Photographs (Edwin Barnard NLA 2010).

There is not much that is authentic or even sincere about this book. The "story" as told by Barnard is from the viewpoint of the benign coloniser. The author claims (on back cover) not to have convict heritage, but as if to reassure those who do, he lives in hope of finding one in his family one day (yeah, right). Barnard's previous publication is generically very similar: a Reader's Digest of "Antarctica: great stories from the Frozen Continent."

See this critique of the book by Tim Causer (2011) Bentham Project, University College London.

Interviewed on ABC radio (twice) in October 2010 (Radio National 14 October 2010; RA W.A. Port Hedland ) Barnard stated that he merely "stumbled across" these Tasmanian prisoner photographs, omitting to mention, of course, that they had been online at the NLA and the Archives Office of Tasmania for more than a decade (since the 1990s at the National Library), and that he had made ready use of the original research we have provided here online (since 2005) about each photograph. One of the first we documented and discussed was that of prisoner Denis Dogherty (because of Anthony Trollope's account) yet listening to Barnard - who chose to talk at length about Dogherty - you would believe that he alone had unearthed these fascinating facts, such is Barnard's tenor and "excitement" . When asked who photographed the prisoners, his answer was even more disingenuous if not downright arrogant - he failed to mention Nevin by name, dismissing him simply as "some guy" who was a commercial photographer. Yet Barnard's primary source of information about Dogherty was from a page copied from Geoff Lennox (1994), held in Thomas J. Nevin's Photographer File at the National Library of Australia:



NLA CATALOGUE
[Nevin, T. J. : photography related ephemera material collected by the National Library of Australia]
Bib ID 3821234
Dogherty's photograph attributed to T. J. Nevin
Held at the NLA in Nevin's file
Photo taken at the National Library of Australia, 6 Feb 2015
Photos copyright KLW NFC 2015 ARR

Interviewed again by ABC TV journalist Siobhan Heanue on 22 February 2011 (video on page) and filmed at the NLA with the prisoner mugshots laid out before him, Edwin Barnard repeated the egotistical nonsense that he "discovered" and "unearthed" the convict photographs. Note Siobhan Heanue's error when she states in the video prologue that these mugshots "were taken in the 1850s at Port Arthur" - a comment which betrays ignorance of the historical subject she is reporting.

The release at this time of this book,  Exiled: The Port Arthur Convict Photographs (2010) would lead the public to believe the authors (Edwin Barnard with Hamish Maxwell-Stewart) have published the latest word on the 84 mugshots of Tasmanian prisoners - or to use the NLA's aesthetic term - "convict portraits" - held at the NLA, the majority of which were exhibited there correctly in 1982/1995 and placed online as photographs taken by professional photographer and civil servant Thomas J. Nevin, complete with verso inscriptions, However, as we have painstakingly demonstrated here with original police records and with other archival documents and newspaper accounts on these Thomas J. Nevin weblogs, these prisoners were photographed by Thomas J. Nevin and his brother Constable John Nevin at the Supreme Court Hobart, the Hobart Gaol, and the MPO Hobart Town Hall between 1871 and 1884. Edwin Barnard's research is far too generalized, already out of date, and of no use to photohistorians. As an author, Edwin Barnard has little credibility and should not be referenced as an authority.

On page 83, the so-called "author" of Exiled: The Port Arthur Convict Photographs erroneously states that Thomas Francis was released in March 1875, and that he was 58 years old. Thomas Francis was released on 6th February 1874, and was 62 years old, per police records. Who are you going to believe? The original police record which you can actually SEE here or a vague statement in a glossy vanity publication? And the publication is all vanity and bleeding heart for men who were essentially habitual criminals, whose second and repeat offences, in many cases involving rape and murder, earned them a further term of imprisonment and a mugshot by Nevin at the Hobart Gaol. Would men with similar criminal records from the 1970s receive the same loving treatment? Of course not. Yet the 1870s prisoner photographs were taken for the same reasons and in the same circumstances as those dictated by police regulations today.

Edwin Barnard and the book's historical consultant Hamish Maxwell-Stewart (both British-born, the latter an academic who is best described as the tail wagging the dog with the misinformation he is intent on spawning about Nevin's attribution) of  Exiled: The Port Arthur Convict Photographs have a barely concealed agenda: to encourage the reading of criminality by viewers into a man's physical features, mediated with text and image amidst the echoes of phrenology and the malodour of eugenics. The cliched association of the term "PORT ARTHUR" with these prisoners' mugshots is the honeypot trap with which the authors hope to attract readers.The accompanying biographical narrative to each man's image was mustered by the authors from transportation records, from a few newspaper articles and from a few earlier publications. Information which we had chosen not to publish on these weblogs also appears as lacunae in their book. The tenor of the biographies is one which pleads to forgive these men, to see them even as “pioneers” - a laughable notion. They were pioneers of crime for the police, certainly, because they were habitual offenders and recidivists with long criminal careers, but little else. Each man's entry is plumped up with irrelevant colorful graphica to render the whole product as an unproblematic, glossy coffee-table paperback aimed at children. Pages decorated with a lot of pretty paintings bear little if any connection to the prisoner's photograph despite the claim that the book ostensibly deals with PHOTOGRAPHS, i.e. objects which are nothing more than cardboard artefacts and only recently acquired by a national institution, the National Library which has its own history of misuse and abuse of these items, but which - as photographs - had a real history of PRODUCTION in the hands of their PRODUCER, the very real photographer T.J. Nevin. A more appropriate title for this book would be:

OUTCASTS: Biographies of 55 Transported Convicts to Van Diemen's Land, with later police photographs taken by T.J. Nevin.

There is no guarantee that the man in each photograph in this book belonged to the name assigned to him, and that is a real dilemma for anyone wishing to trace their convict ancestry. A case in point involves the descendants of  businessman Henry Jones, founder of IXL Jams, who have been led to believe that the mugshot of prisoner Elijah Elton (pp 161-171) who used the alias John Jones, was their ancestor.

These photographs originally taken by Nevin were either loose duplicates or those removed from the criminal's prison record sheet and Hobart Gaol registers ca. 1915, probably by Edward Searle and John Watt Beattie, who salvaged them from the Sheriff's Office at the Hobart Gaol to display them in Beattie's "Port Arthur Museum" in Hobart. They reproduced prints from Nevin's original glass negatives, according to a visitor from South Australia in 1916, and copied others including the cdvs, which were acquired by the QVMAG on Beattie's death in 1930. Beattie had full government endorsement when Port Arthur, renamed as Carnarvon, was heavily promoted interstate as Tasmania's premier tourist attraction, These mugshots catered to the tourist's contemporary fascination with character typologies, phrenology and eugenics, and the Tasmanian "stain".

The handwritten transcription across the versos of many of these prisoners' photographs  - "Taken at Port Arthur 1874" was the work of the second archivist to catalogue the collection sometime between 1915 and 1934. The first archivist, whoever that was, who began organizing these cdvs printed in oval mounts into a collection just before 1915 and probably to make copies, omitted any reference to Port Arthur, i.e. "Taken at Port Arthur" does NOT appear on the versos of the first three cartes numbered 1 to 3, those cartes of prisoners George Nutt, William Yeomans and Bewley Tuck. Port Arthur was not the main place of incarceration by July 1873: just 40 prisoners were left there when the report on closure of the prison was tabled in Parliament on 15th July 1873 and those prisoners were returned to Hobart by late 1873. Nevin had already photographed sixty (60) transferees from Port Arthur by that date, some previously as early as 1871 at their Supreme Court trials in Hobart before they were sent to Port Arthur. The constant mantra about these photographs being "portraits of Port Arthur convicts" is completely misleading. Read the meme in the title - "PHOTOGRAPHS" - they were police photographs taken for and used by the Municipal Police Office, Hobart in the course of daily surveillance and prosecution.





Above: page 12, Exiled, with recto and verso of carte of prisoner Thomas Francis, photo by T.J. Nevin, 6th Feb. 1874.

The number "231" written on the verso of this carte is NOT a number allocated to the prisoner, as the note above suggests: it is the number used by the copyist and cataloguist in the early 1900s for archiving, and for exhibiting in the 1934 exhibition to commemorate Beattie's bequest to the Launceston City Council and Queen Victoria Museum, Launceston,

Attractive but by no means accurate, this publication called Exiled: The Port Arthur Convict Photographs (Barnard 2010) creates more problems that it resolves and no doubt that is the result hoped for by the supporters of the fantasy about the non-photographer A.H. Boyd. The notes about Thomas J. Nevin on page 15 prevaricate upon his unique legacy with the usual idiocies about the non-photographer A.H. Boyd quoting the desperate and deliberate falsifications from the lamentable and covetous Julia Clark. Many phrases from these Nevin weblogs can be traced throughout the texts, both the general notes and notes specific to each photograph, yet no courtesy request was received by us from Edwin Barnard or the NLA. The information one would expect in such a book with such a subtitle "The Port Arthur Convict Photographs" should include a biography of the photographer (Nevin's has been online since 2005), the types of cameras he used, his studio practice and assistants, his methods of producing a carte-de-visite in an oval mount from his glass negative, government documents detailing his contractual engagement and civil service, the police requirements and judicial regulations, and all the rest about the reproduction, copying and distribution of Nevin's prisoner photographs by later photographers and archivists from the early 1900s. Those key topoi have unfolded on these Thomas J. Nevin weblogs since 2005 and are exclusively copyrighted to the weblog authors.



Note on Thomas J. Nevin, p.15, Exiled; The Port Arthur Convict Photographs. the possibility that not only Thomas Nevin but also his brother Constable John Nevin at the Hobart Gaol worked for police as police photographers does not cross the author's mind.

For these reasons, any attempt by the National Library of Australia in this publication (or any other) at the diminishment of Nevin's technical and official achievements as the only police photographer of the 1870s (assisted by his brother Constable John Nevin) who produced these prisoner photographs in Tasmania has to be viewed in the context of the fishbowl politics of the National Library of Australia. In other words, Edwin Barnard's claims that he has written a book about PHOTOGRAPHS are irrelevant in the context of the history of police photography. The rest of the world's assessment of T.J. Nevin as "the photographer of the earliest surviving Australian prisoner mugshots" is more than ever consolidated by the NLA's failings as a result.







[Above]: pages 82- 83, Exiled; The Port Arthur Convict Photographs (NLA 2010) with errors about the prisoner Thomas Francis. Photos copyright © KLW NFC 2010 ARR.

Summary



RELATED posts main weblog


Australia's FIRST MUGSHOTS

PLEASE NOTE: Below each image held at the National Library of Australia is their catalogue batch edit which gives the false impression that all these "convict portraits" were taken solely because these men were transported convicts per se (i.e before cessation in 1853), and that they might have been photographed as a one-off amateur portfolio by a prison official at the Port Arthur prison in 1874, which they were not. Any reference to the Port Arthur prison official A. H. Boyd on the NLA catalogue records is an error, a PARASITIC ATTRIBUTION with no basis in fact. The men in these images were photographed in the 1870s-1880s because they were repeatedly sentenced as habitual offenders whose mugshots were taken on arrest, trial, arraignment, incarceration and/or discharge by government contractor, police and prisons photographer T. J. Nevin at the Supreme Court and adjoining Hobart Gaol with his brother Constable John Nevin, and at the Municipal Police Office, Hobart Town Hall when appearing at The Mayor's Court. The Nevin brothers produced over a thousand originals and duplicates of Tasmanian prisoners, the bulk now lost or destroyed. The three hundred extant mugshots were the random estrays salvaged - and reproduced in many instances- for sale at Beattie's local convictaria museum in Hobart and at interstate exhibitions associated with the fake convict ship Success in the early 1900s. The mugshots were selected on the basis of the prisoner's notoriety from the Supreme Court trial registers (Rough Calendar), the Habitual Criminals Registers (Gaol Photo Books), warrant forms, and police gazettes records of the 1870s-1880s. The earliest taken on government contract by T. J. Nevin date from 1872. The police records sourced here are from the weekly police gazettes which were called (until 1884) Tasmania Reports of Crime Information for Police 1871-1885. J. Barnard, Gov't Printer.